linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: change the device names in usb_bind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130517172335.GX5600@atomide.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 May 2013 10:23:35 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc:	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@....fi>, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, balbi@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP4: change the device names in usb_bind_phy

* Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> [130516 22:45]:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thursday 16 May 2013 09:50 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@....fi> [130516 09:11]:
> >>On 16/05/13 18:58, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>>* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@....fi> [130515 03:59]:
> >>>
> >>>Just checking.. Do you have CONFIG_OMAP_OCP2SCP=y in your .config? Sounds
> >>>like the some transceivers should depend on that for omap4.
> >>
> >>Yes, I have OCP2SCP=y.
> >
> >Hmm well no idea beyond that then. Sounds like Kishon should check it.
> >
> >>>>The musb-hdrc id is wrong on overo also.
> >>>
> >>>Hmm has there been a fix posted for that?
> >>
> >>I couldn't find with a quick look. We debugged and discussed this on an irc
> >>channel with Kishon, who said he'll send a patch. Changing the musb-hdrc ID
> >>on overo fixed the issue, and it looks very similar to the error on 4430sdp.
> >>The overo fix was just:
> 
> hmm.. I think using device name to bind the controller and the phy
> can no longer be used reliably. I think it's better to have
> something like what Grant suggested in my other patch series.. to
> have the phy reference into the host controllers platform_data
> structure. And for the phy reference I'll have label and id.
> 
> Does this makes sense to you?

Sounds OK to me, but I guess that would be for v3.11. I think we
still need a fix for at least overo for v3.10?

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/