[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQVofGoSk7q5-0irjkBxemqK729cND4hov-1QCBJDhxpgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 10:54:07 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Gloger <wg@...loc.de>
Subject: Re: 3.9 breaks EFI boot on E350
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Christian König
<christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
> Am 16.05.2013 17:42, schrieb Yinghai Lu:
>
>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Christian König
>> <christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 16.05.2013 17:17, schrieb Yinghai Lu:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Christian König
>>>> <christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 16.05.2013 11:41, schrieb Christian König:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ups, the board DOES have a serial port, and I've got a log now that
>>>>> shows
>>>>> the mentioned patch above isn't the root cause.
>>>>>
>>>>> After commit 8d57470d8f859635deffe3919d7d4867b488b85a it indeed crashes
>>>>> very
>>>>> early in the boot sequence, but commit
>>>>> 98e7a989979b185f49e86ddaed2ad6890299d9f0 fixes that and now it crashes
>>>>> while
>>>>> trying to unpack the initrd with a completely different backtrace.
>>>>>
>>>> ok, did you post the boot log for that failing boot ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, the bootlog is attached, but I also send it as "3.9 breaks EFI boot
>>> on
>>> E350 v2" to LKML with a request for help.
>>
>> can you boot with appending with "memtest"?
>
>
> Sure, bootlog with memtest is attached.
Please check attached patch, it should fix the problem.
Thanks
Yinghai
Download attachment "merge_mapped_range.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (2246 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists