[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51969A2D.8080902@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 14:59:25 -0600
From: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] BusLogic: Message logging neatening
On 05/17/2013 02:35 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 14:18 -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 21:58 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> If you're going through the trouble to fix this CamelCase stuff
>>> and make it work on 64 bit, how about a little more cleanup?
>>
>> Sounds good to me.
>
> btw, for the BusLogic code:
>
> There seem to be places where addresses are cast to u32.
>
> I don't know the code at all, but that could likely
> cause problems with 64 bit addresses.
>
> $ git grep "(u32)" drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c
> drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c: ccb->dma_handle = (u32) blkp + offset;
> drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c: fpinfo->base_addr = (u32) adapter->io_addr;
> drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c: extmbox_req.base_mbox_addr = (u32) adapter->mbox_space_handle;
>
All of those fields indeed hold only a 32-bit address since the driver
calls pci_set_dma_mask() with DMA mask of 32-bit and then allocates
memory pointed to by these fields with pci_alloc_consistent(). So I
think we are ok here.
Manipulation of all these pointers in this code is something that could
use a cleaner rewrite at some point. The way it is done in the original
code does not make me comfortable. I cleaned up what could be done
without a rewrite.
--
Khalid
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists