[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130517213246.830373308@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 14:35:38 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: [ 023/102] sched: Avoid prev->stime underflow
3.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
commit 68aa8efcd1ab961e4684ef5af32f72a6ec1911de upstream.
Dave Hansen reported strange utime/stime values on his system:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/4/435
This happens because prev->stime value is bigger than rtime
value. Root of the problem are non-monotonic rtime values (i.e.
current rtime is smaller than previous rtime) and that should be
debugged and fixed.
But since problem did not manifest itself before commit
62188451f0d63add7ad0cd2a1ae269d600c1663d "cputime: Avoid
multiplication overflow on utime scaling", it should be threated
as regression, which we can easily fixed on cputime_adjust()
function.
For now, let's apply this fix, but further work is needed to fix
root of the problem.
Reported-and-tested-by: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1367314507-9728-3-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ static void cputime_adjust(struct task_c
struct cputime *prev,
cputime_t *ut, cputime_t *st)
{
- cputime_t rtime, stime, total;
+ cputime_t rtime, stime, utime, total;
stime = curr->stime;
total = stime + curr->utime;
@@ -599,13 +599,13 @@ static void cputime_adjust(struct task_c
if (prev->stime + prev->utime >= rtime)
goto out;
- if (!rtime) {
- stime = 0;
- } else if (!total) {
- stime = rtime;
- } else {
+ if (total) {
stime = scale_stime((__force u64)stime,
(__force u64)rtime, (__force u64)total);
+ utime = rtime - stime;
+ } else {
+ stime = rtime;
+ utime = 0;
}
/*
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ static void cputime_adjust(struct task_c
* Let's enforce monotonicity.
*/
prev->stime = max(prev->stime, stime);
- prev->utime = max(prev->utime, rtime - prev->stime);
+ prev->utime = max(prev->utime, utime);
out:
*ut = prev->utime;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists