linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Use common of_clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5196B539.4040708@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Fri, 17 May 2013 16:54:49 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
CC:	mturquette@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Use common of_clk_init() function

On 04/04/2013 03:05 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> Use common of_clk_init() function for clocks initialization.

Prashant, can you please resend this to Mike for inclusion in 3.11; now
that we have moved the Tegra clock driver out of arch/arm/mach-tegra, we
should send all clock driver changes through Mike if possible. Thanks.

Just one question though:

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/common.c

> -#include <linux/clk/tegra.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>

Is clk-provider.h the right header? This code isn't a clock provider?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/