3.6.11.4 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: "J. Bruce Fields" [ Upstream commit 0c7c3e67ab91ec6caa44bdf1fc89a48012ceb0c5 ] Don't actually close any opens until we don't need them at all. This means being left with write access when it's not really necessary, but that's better than putting a file that might still have posix locks held on it, as we have been. Reported-by: Toralf Förster Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c index 5b3224c..0ecd408 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -217,13 +217,7 @@ static void __nfs4_file_put_access(struct nfs4_file *fp, int oflag) { if (atomic_dec_and_test(&fp->fi_access[oflag])) { nfs4_file_put_fd(fp, oflag); - /* - * It's also safe to get rid of the RDWR open *if* - * we no longer have need of the other kind of access - * or if we already have the other kind of open: - */ - if (fp->fi_fds[1-oflag] - || atomic_read(&fp->fi_access[1 - oflag]) == 0) + if (atomic_read(&fp->fi_access[1 - oflag]) == 0) nfs4_file_put_fd(fp, O_RDWR); } } -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/