lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130519200320.GA27407@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 19 May 2013 23:03:21 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	"Narasimhan, Sriram" <sriram.narasimhan@...com>
Cc:	"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
	<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: Reporting traffic queue distribution
 statistics through ethtool

On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 04:09:48PM +0000, Narasimhan, Sriram wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> I was getting all packets on the same inbound queue which
> is why I added this support to virtio-net (and some more
> instrumentation at tun as well).  But, it turned out to be
> my misconfiguration - I did not enable IFF_MULTI_QUEUE on
> the tap device, so the real_num_tx_queues on tap netdev was 
> always 1 (no tx distribution at tap).

Interesting that qemu didn't fail.

> I am thinking about 
> adding a -q option to tunctl to specify multi-queue flag on
> the tap device.

Absolutely.

> Yes, number of exits will be most useful.  I will look into
> adding the other statistics you mention.
> 
> Sriram  

Pls note you'll need to switch to virtqueue_kick_prepare
to detect exits: virtqueue_kick doesn't let you know
whether there was an exit.

Also, it's best to make this a separate patch from the one
adding per-queue stats.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst@...hat.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 4:28 AM
> To: Narasimhan, Sriram
> Cc: rusty@...tcorp.com.au; virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org; kvm@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: Reporting traffic queue distribution statistics through ethtool
> 
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 01:24:29PM -0700, Sriram Narasimhan wrote:
> > This patch allows virtio-net driver to report traffic distribution
> > to inbound/outbound queues through ethtool -S.  The per_cpu
> > virtnet_stats is split into receive and transmit stats and are
> > maintained on a per receive_queue and send_queue basis.
> > virtnet_stats() is modified to aggregate interface level statistics
> > from per-queue statistics.  Sample output below:
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the patch. The idea itself looks OK to me.
> Ben Hutchings already sent some comments
> so I won't repeat them. Some minor more comments
> and questions below.
> 
> > NIC statistics:
> >      rxq0: rx_packets: 4357802
> >      rxq0: rx_bytes: 292642052
> >      txq0: tx_packets: 824540
> >      txq0: tx_bytes: 55256404
> >      rxq1: rx_packets: 0
> >      rxq1: rx_bytes: 0
> >      txq1: tx_packets: 1094268
> >      txq1: tx_bytes: 73328316
> >      rxq2: rx_packets: 0
> >      rxq2: rx_bytes: 0
> >      txq2: tx_packets: 1091466
> >      txq2: tx_bytes: 73140566
> >      rxq3: rx_packets: 0
> >      rxq3: rx_bytes: 0
> >      txq3: tx_packets: 1093043
> >      txq3: tx_bytes: 73246142
> 
> Interesting. This example implies that all packets are coming in
> through the same RX queue - is this right?
> If yes that's worth exploring - could be a tun bug -
> and shows how this patch is useful.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Sriram Narasimhan <sriram.narasimhan@...com>
> 
> BTW, while you are looking at the stats, one other interesting
> thing to add could be checking more types of stats: number of exits,
> queue full errors, etc.
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c |  157 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  1 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index 3c23fdc..3c58c52 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -41,15 +41,46 @@ module_param(gso, bool, 0444);
> >  
> >  #define VIRTNET_DRIVER_VERSION "1.0.0"
> >  
> > -struct virtnet_stats {
> > -	struct u64_stats_sync tx_syncp;
> > +struct virtnet_rx_stats {
> >  	struct u64_stats_sync rx_syncp;
> > -	u64 tx_bytes;
> > +	u64 rx_packets;
> > +	u64 rx_bytes;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct virtnet_tx_stats {
> > +	struct u64_stats_sync tx_syncp;
> >  	u64 tx_packets;
> > +	u64 tx_bytes;
> > +};
> >  
> > -	u64 rx_bytes;
> > -	u64 rx_packets;
> 
> I think maintaining the stats in a per-queue data structure like this is
> fine.  if # of CPUs == # of queues which is typical, we use same amount
> of memory.  And each queue access is under a lock,
> or from napi thread, so no races either.
> 
> > +struct virtnet_ethtool_stats {
> > +	char desc[ETH_GSTRING_LEN];
> > +	int type;
> > +	int size;
> > +	int offset;
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum {VIRTNET_STATS_TX, VIRTNET_STATS_RX};
> > +
> > +#define VIRTNET_RX_STATS_INFO(_struct, _field) \
> > +	{#_field, VIRTNET_STATS_RX, FIELD_SIZEOF(_struct, _field), \
> > +	offsetof(_struct, _field)}
> > +
> > +#define VIRTNET_TX_STATS_INFO(_struct, _field) \
> > +	{#_field, VIRTNET_STATS_TX, FIELD_SIZEOF(_struct, _field), \
> > +	offsetof(_struct, _field)}
> > +
> > +static const struct virtnet_ethtool_stats virtnet_et_rx_stats[] = {
> > +	VIRTNET_RX_STATS_INFO(struct virtnet_rx_stats, rx_packets),
> > +	VIRTNET_RX_STATS_INFO(struct virtnet_rx_stats, rx_bytes)
> > +};
> > +#define VIRTNET_RX_STATS_NUM (ARRAY_SIZE(virtnet_et_rx_stats))
> > +
> > +static const struct virtnet_ethtool_stats virtnet_et_tx_stats[] = {
> > +	VIRTNET_TX_STATS_INFO(struct virtnet_tx_stats, tx_packets),
> > +	VIRTNET_TX_STATS_INFO(struct virtnet_tx_stats, tx_bytes)
> >  };
> > +#define VIRTNET_TX_STATS_NUM (ARRAY_SIZE(virtnet_et_tx_stats))
> 
> I'd prefer a full name: virtnet_ethtool_tx_stats, or
> just virtnet_tx_stats.
> 
> >  
> >  /* Internal representation of a send virtqueue */
> >  struct send_queue {
> > @@ -61,6 +92,9 @@ struct send_queue {
> >  
> >  	/* Name of the send queue: output.$index */
> >  	char name[40];
> > +
> > +	/* Active send queue statistics */
> > +	struct virtnet_tx_stats stats;
> >  };
> >  
> >  /* Internal representation of a receive virtqueue */
> > @@ -81,6 +115,9 @@ struct receive_queue {
> >  
> >  	/* Name of this receive queue: input.$index */
> >  	char name[40];
> > +
> > +	/* Active receive queue statistics */
> > +	struct virtnet_rx_stats stats;
> >  };
> >  
> >  struct virtnet_info {
> > @@ -109,9 +146,6 @@ struct virtnet_info {
> >  	/* enable config space updates */
> >  	bool config_enable;
> >  
> > -	/* Active statistics */
> > -	struct virtnet_stats __percpu *stats;
> > -
> >  	/* Work struct for refilling if we run low on memory. */
> >  	struct delayed_work refill;
> >  
> > @@ -330,7 +364,7 @@ static void receive_buf(struct receive_queue *rq, void *buf, unsigned int len)
> >  {
> >  	struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> >  	struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> > -	struct virtnet_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(vi->stats);
> > +	struct virtnet_rx_stats *stats = &rq->stats;
> >  	struct sk_buff *skb;
> >  	struct page *page;
> >  	struct skb_vnet_hdr *hdr;
> > @@ -650,8 +684,7 @@ static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq)
> >  {
> >  	struct sk_buff *skb;
> >  	unsigned int len;
> > -	struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
> > -	struct virtnet_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(vi->stats);
> > +	struct virtnet_tx_stats *stats = &sq->stats;
> >  
> >  	while ((skb = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> >  		pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> > @@ -841,24 +874,25 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev,
> >  					       struct rtnl_link_stats64 *tot)
> >  {
> >  	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > -	int cpu;
> > +	int i;
> >  	unsigned int start;
> >  
> > -	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > -		struct virtnet_stats *stats = per_cpu_ptr(vi->stats, cpu);
> > +	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> > +		struct virtnet_tx_stats *tstats = &vi->sq[i].stats;
> > +		struct virtnet_rx_stats *rstats = &vi->rq[i].stats;
> >  		u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes;
> >  
> >  		do {
> > -			start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh(&stats->tx_syncp);
> > -			tpackets = stats->tx_packets;
> > -			tbytes   = stats->tx_bytes;
> > -		} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh(&stats->tx_syncp, start));
> > +			start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh(&tstats->tx_syncp);
> > +			tpackets = tstats->tx_packets;
> > +			tbytes   = tstats->tx_bytes;
> > +		} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh(&tstats->tx_syncp, start));
> >  
> >  		do {
> > -			start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh(&stats->rx_syncp);
> > -			rpackets = stats->rx_packets;
> > -			rbytes   = stats->rx_bytes;
> > -		} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh(&stats->rx_syncp, start));
> > +			start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh(&rstats->rx_syncp);
> > +			rpackets = rstats->rx_packets;
> > +			rbytes   = rstats->rx_bytes;
> > +		} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh(&rstats->rx_syncp, start));
> >  
> >  		tot->rx_packets += rpackets;
> >  		tot->tx_packets += tpackets;
> > @@ -1177,12 +1211,83 @@ static void virtnet_get_channels(struct net_device *dev,
> >  	channels->other_count = 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void virtnet_get_stat_strings(struct net_device *dev,
> > +					u32 stringset,
> > +					u8 *data)
> > +{
> > +	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > +	int i, j;
> > +
> > +	switch (stringset) {
> > +	case ETH_SS_STATS:
> > +		for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> > +			for (j = 0; j < VIRTNET_RX_STATS_NUM; j++) {
> > +				sprintf(data, "rxq%d: %s", i,
> > +					virtnet_et_rx_stats[j].desc);
> > +				data += ETH_GSTRING_LEN;
> > +			}
> > +			for (j = 0; j < VIRTNET_TX_STATS_NUM; j++) {
> > +				sprintf(data, "txq%d: %s", i,
> > +					virtnet_et_tx_stats[j].desc);
> > +				data += ETH_GSTRING_LEN;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int virtnet_get_sset_count(struct net_device *dev, int stringset)
> > +{
> > +	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > +	switch (stringset) {
> > +	case ETH_SS_STATS:
> > +		return vi->max_queue_pairs *
> > +			(VIRTNET_RX_STATS_NUM + VIRTNET_TX_STATS_NUM);
> > +	default:
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void virtnet_get_ethtool_stats(struct net_device *dev,
> > +					struct ethtool_stats *stats,
> > +					u64 *data)
> > +{
> > +	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > +	unsigned int i, base;
> > +	unsigned int start;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0, base = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> > +		struct virtnet_tx_stats *tstats = &vi->sq[i].stats;
> > +		struct virtnet_rx_stats *rstats = &vi->rq[i].stats;
> > +
> > +		do {
> > +			start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh(&rstats->rx_syncp);
> > +			data[base] = rstats->rx_packets;
> > +			data[base+1] = rstats->rx_bytes;
> 
> nitpicking:
> We normally has spaces around +, like this:
> 			data[base + 1] = rstats->rx_bytes;
> 
> > +		} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh(&rstats->rx_syncp, start));
> > +
> > +		base += VIRTNET_RX_STATS_NUM;
> > +
> > +		do {
> > +			start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh(&tstats->tx_syncp);
> > +			data[base] = tstats->tx_packets;
> > +			data[base+1]   = tstats->tx_bytes;
> 
> 
> nitpicking:
> Here, something strange happened to indentation.
> 
> > +		} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh(&tstats->tx_syncp, start));
> > +
> > +		base += VIRTNET_TX_STATS_NUM;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> >  static const struct ethtool_ops virtnet_ethtool_ops = {
> >  	.get_drvinfo = virtnet_get_drvinfo,
> >  	.get_link = ethtool_op_get_link,
> >  	.get_ringparam = virtnet_get_ringparam,
> >  	.set_channels = virtnet_set_channels,
> >  	.get_channels = virtnet_get_channels,
> > +	.get_strings = virtnet_get_stat_strings,
> > +	.get_sset_count = virtnet_get_sset_count,
> > +	.get_ethtool_stats = virtnet_get_ethtool_stats,
> >  };
> >  
> >  #define MIN_MTU 68
> > @@ -1531,14 +1636,11 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >  	vi->dev = dev;
> >  	vi->vdev = vdev;
> >  	vdev->priv = vi;
> > -	vi->stats = alloc_percpu(struct virtnet_stats);
> >  	err = -ENOMEM;
> > -	if (vi->stats == NULL)
> > -		goto free;
> >  
> >  	vi->vq_index = alloc_percpu(int);
> >  	if (vi->vq_index == NULL)
> > -		goto free_stats;
> > +		goto free;
> >  
> >  	mutex_init(&vi->config_lock);
> >  	vi->config_enable = true;
> > @@ -1616,8 +1718,6 @@ free_vqs:
> >  	virtnet_del_vqs(vi);
> >  free_index:
> >  	free_percpu(vi->vq_index);
> > -free_stats:
> > -	free_percpu(vi->stats);
> >  free:
> >  	free_netdev(dev);
> >  	return err;
> > @@ -1653,7 +1753,6 @@ static void virtnet_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >  	flush_work(&vi->config_work);
> >  
> >  	free_percpu(vi->vq_index);
> > -	free_percpu(vi->stats);
> >  	free_netdev(vi->dev);
> >  }
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > -- 
> > 1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ