[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130519112800.GG19883@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 14:28:00 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Sriram Narasimhan <sriram.narasimhan@...com>
Cc: rusty@...tcorp.com.au, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: Reporting traffic queue distribution
statistics through ethtool
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 01:24:29PM -0700, Sriram Narasimhan wrote:
> This patch allows virtio-net driver to report traffic distribution
> to inbound/outbound queues through ethtool -S. The per_cpu
> virtnet_stats is split into receive and transmit stats and are
> maintained on a per receive_queue and send_queue basis.
> virtnet_stats() is modified to aggregate interface level statistics
> from per-queue statistics. Sample output below:
>
Thanks for the patch. The idea itself looks OK to me.
Ben Hutchings already sent some comments
so I won't repeat them. Some minor more comments
and questions below.
> NIC statistics:
> rxq0: rx_packets: 4357802
> rxq0: rx_bytes: 292642052
> txq0: tx_packets: 824540
> txq0: tx_bytes: 55256404
> rxq1: rx_packets: 0
> rxq1: rx_bytes: 0
> txq1: tx_packets: 1094268
> txq1: tx_bytes: 73328316
> rxq2: rx_packets: 0
> rxq2: rx_bytes: 0
> txq2: tx_packets: 1091466
> txq2: tx_bytes: 73140566
> rxq3: rx_packets: 0
> rxq3: rx_bytes: 0
> txq3: tx_packets: 1093043
> txq3: tx_bytes: 73246142
Interesting. This example implies that all packets are coming in
through the same RX queue - is this right?
If yes that's worth exploring - could be a tun bug -
and shows how this patch is useful.
> Signed-off-by: Sriram Narasimhan <sriram.narasimhan@...com>
BTW, while you are looking at the stats, one other interesting
thing to add could be checking more types of stats: number of exits,
queue full errors, etc.
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 3c23fdc..3c58c52 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -41,15 +41,46 @@ module_param(gso, bool, 0444);
>
> #define VIRTNET_DRIVER_VERSION "1.0.0"
>
> -struct virtnet_stats {
> - struct u64_stats_sync tx_syncp;
> +struct virtnet_rx_stats {
> struct u64_stats_sync rx_syncp;
> - u64 tx_bytes;
> + u64 rx_packets;
> + u64 rx_bytes;
> +};
> +
> +struct virtnet_tx_stats {
> + struct u64_stats_sync tx_syncp;
> u64 tx_packets;
> + u64 tx_bytes;
> +};
>
> - u64 rx_bytes;
> - u64 rx_packets;
I think maintaining the stats in a per-queue data structure like this is
fine. if # of CPUs == # of queues which is typical, we use same amount
of memory. And each queue access is under a lock,
or from napi thread, so no races either.
> +struct virtnet_ethtool_stats {
> + char desc[ETH_GSTRING_LEN];
> + int type;
> + int size;
> + int offset;
> +};
> +
> +enum {VIRTNET_STATS_TX, VIRTNET_STATS_RX};
> +
> +#define VIRTNET_RX_STATS_INFO(_struct, _field) \
> + {#_field, VIRTNET_STATS_RX, FIELD_SIZEOF(_struct, _field), \
> + offsetof(_struct, _field)}
> +
> +#define VIRTNET_TX_STATS_INFO(_struct, _field) \
> + {#_field, VIRTNET_STATS_TX, FIELD_SIZEOF(_struct, _field), \
> + offsetof(_struct, _field)}
> +
> +static const struct virtnet_ethtool_stats virtnet_et_rx_stats[] = {
> + VIRTNET_RX_STATS_INFO(struct virtnet_rx_stats, rx_packets),
> + VIRTNET_RX_STATS_INFO(struct virtnet_rx_stats, rx_bytes)
> +};
> +#define VIRTNET_RX_STATS_NUM (ARRAY_SIZE(virtnet_et_rx_stats))
> +
> +static const struct virtnet_ethtool_stats virtnet_et_tx_stats[] = {
> + VIRTNET_TX_STATS_INFO(struct virtnet_tx_stats, tx_packets),
> + VIRTNET_TX_STATS_INFO(struct virtnet_tx_stats, tx_bytes)
> };
> +#define VIRTNET_TX_STATS_NUM (ARRAY_SIZE(virtnet_et_tx_stats))
I'd prefer a full name: virtnet_ethtool_tx_stats, or
just virtnet_tx_stats.
>
> /* Internal representation of a send virtqueue */
> struct send_queue {
> @@ -61,6 +92,9 @@ struct send_queue {
>
> /* Name of the send queue: output.$index */
> char name[40];
> +
> + /* Active send queue statistics */
> + struct virtnet_tx_stats stats;
> };
>
> /* Internal representation of a receive virtqueue */
> @@ -81,6 +115,9 @@ struct receive_queue {
>
> /* Name of this receive queue: input.$index */
> char name[40];
> +
> + /* Active receive queue statistics */
> + struct virtnet_rx_stats stats;
> };
>
> struct virtnet_info {
> @@ -109,9 +146,6 @@ struct virtnet_info {
> /* enable config space updates */
> bool config_enable;
>
> - /* Active statistics */
> - struct virtnet_stats __percpu *stats;
> -
> /* Work struct for refilling if we run low on memory. */
> struct delayed_work refill;
>
> @@ -330,7 +364,7 @@ static void receive_buf(struct receive_queue *rq, void *buf, unsigned int len)
> {
> struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> - struct virtnet_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(vi->stats);
> + struct virtnet_rx_stats *stats = &rq->stats;
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> struct page *page;
> struct skb_vnet_hdr *hdr;
> @@ -650,8 +684,7 @@ static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq)
> {
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> unsigned int len;
> - struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
> - struct virtnet_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(vi->stats);
> + struct virtnet_tx_stats *stats = &sq->stats;
>
> while ((skb = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> @@ -841,24 +874,25 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *virtnet_stats(struct net_device *dev,
> struct rtnl_link_stats64 *tot)
> {
> struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> - int cpu;
> + int i;
> unsigned int start;
>
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - struct virtnet_stats *stats = per_cpu_ptr(vi->stats, cpu);
> + for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> + struct virtnet_tx_stats *tstats = &vi->sq[i].stats;
> + struct virtnet_rx_stats *rstats = &vi->rq[i].stats;
> u64 tpackets, tbytes, rpackets, rbytes;
>
> do {
> - start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh(&stats->tx_syncp);
> - tpackets = stats->tx_packets;
> - tbytes = stats->tx_bytes;
> - } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh(&stats->tx_syncp, start));
> + start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh(&tstats->tx_syncp);
> + tpackets = tstats->tx_packets;
> + tbytes = tstats->tx_bytes;
> + } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh(&tstats->tx_syncp, start));
>
> do {
> - start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh(&stats->rx_syncp);
> - rpackets = stats->rx_packets;
> - rbytes = stats->rx_bytes;
> - } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh(&stats->rx_syncp, start));
> + start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh(&rstats->rx_syncp);
> + rpackets = rstats->rx_packets;
> + rbytes = rstats->rx_bytes;
> + } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh(&rstats->rx_syncp, start));
>
> tot->rx_packets += rpackets;
> tot->tx_packets += tpackets;
> @@ -1177,12 +1211,83 @@ static void virtnet_get_channels(struct net_device *dev,
> channels->other_count = 0;
> }
>
> +static void virtnet_get_stat_strings(struct net_device *dev,
> + u32 stringset,
> + u8 *data)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> + int i, j;
> +
> + switch (stringset) {
> + case ETH_SS_STATS:
> + for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> + for (j = 0; j < VIRTNET_RX_STATS_NUM; j++) {
> + sprintf(data, "rxq%d: %s", i,
> + virtnet_et_rx_stats[j].desc);
> + data += ETH_GSTRING_LEN;
> + }
> + for (j = 0; j < VIRTNET_TX_STATS_NUM; j++) {
> + sprintf(data, "txq%d: %s", i,
> + virtnet_et_tx_stats[j].desc);
> + data += ETH_GSTRING_LEN;
> + }
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int virtnet_get_sset_count(struct net_device *dev, int stringset)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> + switch (stringset) {
> + case ETH_SS_STATS:
> + return vi->max_queue_pairs *
> + (VIRTNET_RX_STATS_NUM + VIRTNET_TX_STATS_NUM);
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void virtnet_get_ethtool_stats(struct net_device *dev,
> + struct ethtool_stats *stats,
> + u64 *data)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> + unsigned int i, base;
> + unsigned int start;
> +
> + for (i = 0, base = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> + struct virtnet_tx_stats *tstats = &vi->sq[i].stats;
> + struct virtnet_rx_stats *rstats = &vi->rq[i].stats;
> +
> + do {
> + start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh(&rstats->rx_syncp);
> + data[base] = rstats->rx_packets;
> + data[base+1] = rstats->rx_bytes;
nitpicking:
We normally has spaces around +, like this:
data[base + 1] = rstats->rx_bytes;
> + } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh(&rstats->rx_syncp, start));
> +
> + base += VIRTNET_RX_STATS_NUM;
> +
> + do {
> + start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh(&tstats->tx_syncp);
> + data[base] = tstats->tx_packets;
> + data[base+1] = tstats->tx_bytes;
nitpicking:
Here, something strange happened to indentation.
> + } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_bh(&tstats->tx_syncp, start));
> +
> + base += VIRTNET_TX_STATS_NUM;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +
> static const struct ethtool_ops virtnet_ethtool_ops = {
> .get_drvinfo = virtnet_get_drvinfo,
> .get_link = ethtool_op_get_link,
> .get_ringparam = virtnet_get_ringparam,
> .set_channels = virtnet_set_channels,
> .get_channels = virtnet_get_channels,
> + .get_strings = virtnet_get_stat_strings,
> + .get_sset_count = virtnet_get_sset_count,
> + .get_ethtool_stats = virtnet_get_ethtool_stats,
> };
>
> #define MIN_MTU 68
> @@ -1531,14 +1636,11 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> vi->dev = dev;
> vi->vdev = vdev;
> vdev->priv = vi;
> - vi->stats = alloc_percpu(struct virtnet_stats);
> err = -ENOMEM;
> - if (vi->stats == NULL)
> - goto free;
>
> vi->vq_index = alloc_percpu(int);
> if (vi->vq_index == NULL)
> - goto free_stats;
> + goto free;
>
> mutex_init(&vi->config_lock);
> vi->config_enable = true;
> @@ -1616,8 +1718,6 @@ free_vqs:
> virtnet_del_vqs(vi);
> free_index:
> free_percpu(vi->vq_index);
> -free_stats:
> - free_percpu(vi->stats);
> free:
> free_netdev(dev);
> return err;
> @@ -1653,7 +1753,6 @@ static void virtnet_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> flush_work(&vi->config_work);
>
> free_percpu(vi->vq_index);
> - free_percpu(vi->stats);
> free_netdev(vi->dev);
> }
Thanks!
> --
> 1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists