[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5198D76C.7020500@amd.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 15:45:16 +0200
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Gloger <wg@...loc.de>
Subject: Re: 3.9 breaks EFI boot on E350
Am 17.05.2013 19:54, schrieb Yinghai Lu:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Christian König
> <christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
>> Am 16.05.2013 17:42, schrieb Yinghai Lu:
>>
>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Christian König
>>> <christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
>>>> Am 16.05.2013 17:17, schrieb Yinghai Lu:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Christian König
>>>>> <christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
>>>>>> Am 16.05.2013 11:41, schrieb Christian König:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ups, the board DOES have a serial port, and I've got a log now that
>>>>>> shows
>>>>>> the mentioned patch above isn't the root cause.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After commit 8d57470d8f859635deffe3919d7d4867b488b85a it indeed crashes
>>>>>> very
>>>>>> early in the boot sequence, but commit
>>>>>> 98e7a989979b185f49e86ddaed2ad6890299d9f0 fixes that and now it crashes
>>>>>> while
>>>>>> trying to unpack the initrd with a completely different backtrace.
>>>>>>
>>>>> ok, did you post the boot log for that failing boot ?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the bootlog is attached, but I also send it as "3.9 breaks EFI boot
>>>> on
>>>> E350 v2" to LKML with a request for help.
>>> can you boot with appending with "memtest"?
>>
>> Sure, bootlog with memtest is attached.
> Please check attached patch, it should fix the problem.
Works perfectly, thanks allot.
Christian.
> Thanks
>
> Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists