[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130519183041.GB30128@mwanda>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 21:30:41 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] gru: fix a sanity test in gru_set_context_option()
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 09:44:42AM -0500, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
>
> Since we're here, maybe we should neaten this up a little?
>
> Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c
> +++ linux/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c
> @@ -876,8 +876,9 @@ int gru_set_context_option(unsigned long
> switch (req.op) {
> case sco_blade_chiplet:
> /* Select blade/chiplet for GRU context */
> - if (req.val1 < -1 || req.val1 >= GRU_MAX_BLADES || !gru_base[req.val1] ||
> - req.val0 < -1 || req.val0 >= GRU_CHIPLETS_PER_HUB) {
> + if (req.val0 < -1 || req.val0 >= GRU_CHIPLETS_PER_HUB ||
> + req.val1 < -1 || req.val1 >= GRU_MAX_BLADES ||
> + (req.val1 >= 0 && !gru_base[req.val1])) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
I generally prefer how in the original code all the sub conditions
were aligned nicely but I will Ack your version as well. Thanks.
regards,
dan carpenter
> } else {
> gts->ts_user_blade_id = req.val1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists