[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305201014220.4719@fry.nucleusys.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:18:17 +0300 (EEST)
From: Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: romieu@...zoreil.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drivers: net: usb: rtl8150: bug fixing and cleanup
On Mon, 20 May 2013, David Miller wrote:
> From: Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com>
> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:09:00 +0300 (EEST)
>
> > What about the .c/.h split?
>
> I have no strong opinion either way.
OK, so i'll prepare new patch series that coalesce my original patch #1
and #2, and apply the Francois suggestion about using the generic
netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() in the interrupt path.
Which tree would you want me to diff against?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists