linux-kernel - Re: NOHZ: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:123 native_smp_send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130520073612.GB24222@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Mon, 20 May 2013 16:36:12 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: NOHZ: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:123
 native_smp_send_reschedule, round 2

Hello,

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 08:47:27AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > So there are two questions here:
> > 1. Is gov_queue_work() want to queue the work on offline cpu?
> > 2. Is mod_delayed_work_on() allow offline cpu?
> > 
> > I guess both should be false?
> 
> Well, if we don't allow queueing work on a cpu which goes offline, i.e.
> #2, the problem should be solved.
> 
> Tejun?

Workqueue proper would behave okish (no affinity of course but the
work items are still executed) but mod_delayed_work_on() adds a timer
on the target CPU and I think adding a timer on an offline cpu would
be a problem.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/