| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:49:46 +0300 (EEST) From: Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> cc: romieu@...zoreil.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drivers: net: usb: rtl8150: bug fixing and cleanup On Mon, 20 May 2013, David Miller wrote: > From: Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com> > Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:18:17 +0300 (EEST) > > > On Mon, 20 May 2013, David Miller wrote: > > > >> From: Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com> > >> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:09:00 +0300 (EEST) > >> > >> > What about the .c/.h split? > >> > >> I have no strong opinion either way. > > > > OK, so i'll prepare new patch series that coalesce my original patch #1 > > and #2, and apply the Francois suggestion about using the generic > > netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() in the interrupt path. > > > > Which tree would you want me to diff against? > > As has been explained to you already, cleanups belong in 'net-next', > bug fixes belong in 'net'. > > If you series has both, you have to submit them separately. Submit > the bug fixes to 'net', then the next time I merge 'net' into 'net-next' > you can submit the cleanups on top against 'net-next'. Got it. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists