[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130520094950.GG31359@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:49:50 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"david.daney@...ium.com" <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: extable: sort the exception table at build time
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 07:49:50PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:43:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > + . = ALIGN(8);
> > + __ex_table : AT(ADDR(__ex_table) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
> > + __start___ex_table = .;
> > + *(__ex_table)
> > + __stop___ex_table = .;
> > + }
>
> Here you could use:
> EXCEPTION_TABLE(align)
>
> (From include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h)
Good spot, I'll spin a v2 using that. Looks like we don't use that for
arch/arm/ because we want to discard the section ifdef CONFIG_MMU. Maybe we
could change the generic macro to expand to nothing if !MMU, but I'm not
sure if other MMU-less architectures are playing tricks with this.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists