[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r4h2zf5y.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 09:38:25 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_pci: fix macro exported in uapi
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> writes:
> Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Macro still isn't usable, because userspace can't know whether it's the
>> new or old.
>>
>> We need to either remove it from UAPI, or rename it to
>> VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF.
>
> Surely, if userspace is using it as is, you can't remove it, rename it or
> alter it?
The point of the patch is that it's unusable:
#define VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG(dev) ((dev)->msix_enabled ? 24 : 20)
ie. it's accessing a member of the kernel's virtio_pci_dev structure.
In theory, userspace could have a structure with the same field and be
using it now, but that's unlikely (qemu certainly doesn't). No harm no
foul.
In theory it's actually a useful macro, so we could expose it to
userspace, but we'd need to have a new name so userspace can #ifdef for
older headers...
Hope that clarifies,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists