[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1369047116-9378-62-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 11:51:01 +0100
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 061/115] audit: Syscall rules are not applied to existing processes on non-x86
3.5.7.13 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
commit cdee3904b4ce7c03d1013ed6dd704b43ae7fc2e9 upstream.
Commit b05d8447e782 (audit: inline audit_syscall_entry to reduce
burden on archs) changed audit_syscall_entry to check for a dummy
context before calling __audit_syscall_entry. Unfortunately the dummy
context state is maintained in __audit_syscall_entry so once set it
never gets cleared, even if the audit rules change.
As a result, if there are no auditing rules when a process starts
then it will never be subject to any rules added later. x86 doesn't
see this because it has an assembly fast path that calls directly into
__audit_syscall_entry.
I noticed this issue when working on audit performance optimisations.
I wrote a set of simple test cases available at:
http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/audit_tests.tar.gz
02_new_rule.py fails without the patch and passes with it. The
test case clears all rules, starts a process, adds a rule then
verifies the process produces a syscall audit record.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
include/linux/audit.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
index eaa7c9f..41b4e49 100644
--- a/include/linux/audit.h
+++ b/include/linux/audit.h
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static inline void audit_syscall_entry(int arch, int major, unsigned long a0,
unsigned long a1, unsigned long a2,
unsigned long a3)
{
- if (unlikely(!audit_dummy_context()))
+ if (unlikely(current->audit_context))
__audit_syscall_entry(arch, major, a0, a1, a2, a3);
}
static inline void audit_syscall_exit(void *pt_regs)
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists