lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 20 May 2013 07:40:24 -0700
From:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To:	Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/linux/posix_acl.h: need 'return NULL' when BUG(), if neither CONFIG_BUG nor HAVE_ARCH_BUG is defined.



Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com> wrote:

>
>If neither CONFIG_BUG nor HAVE_ARCH_BUG is defined, the BUG() will
>defined as empty (e.g. randconfig with MMU for arm s5pv210)
>
>In this case, need 'return NULL' to let upper caller knows the failure.

Seriously?  The correct fix it would seem is to give a useful default BUG definition.  Say *NULL.

Further we should never hit that code in the first place if it calls BUG.  So upper callers should never get there.

If it is ever possible to get there the callers need to be fixed.

Eric

>Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
>---
> include/linux/posix_acl.h |    1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/posix_acl.h b/include/linux/posix_acl.h
>index 7931efe..2c48d06 100644
>--- a/include/linux/posix_acl.h
>+++ b/include/linux/posix_acl.h
>@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ static inline struct posix_acl **acl_by_type(struct
>inode *inode, int type)
> 		return &inode->i_default_acl;
> 	default:
> 		BUG();
>+		return NULL;
> 	}
> }
> 
>-- 
>1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ