lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1369061900-546-8-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 May 2013 07:58:15 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/13] rcu: Remove the CONFIG_TINY_RCU ifdefs in rcutiny.h

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Now that CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU is no more, this commit removes
the CONFIG_TINY_RCU ifdefs from include/linux/rcutiny.h in favor of
unconditionally compiling the CONFIG_TINY_RCU legs of those ifdefs.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Moved removal of #else to "Remove TINY_PREEMPT_RCU" as
  suggested by Josh Triplett. ]
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
---
 include/linux/rcutiny.h | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index e756251..07b5aff 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -37,8 +37,6 @@ static inline void rcu_barrier_sched(void)
 	wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_sched);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
-
 static inline void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
 {
 	synchronize_sched();	/* Only one CPU, so pretty fast anyway!!! */
@@ -49,8 +47,6 @@ static inline void rcu_barrier(void)
 	rcu_barrier_sched();  /* Only one CPU, so only one list of callbacks! */
 }
 
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
-
 static inline void synchronize_rcu_bh(void)
 {
 	synchronize_sched();
@@ -72,8 +68,6 @@ static inline void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head,
 	call_rcu(head, func);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
-
 static inline void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
 {
 }
@@ -84,8 +78,6 @@ static inline int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu, unsigned long *delta_jiffies)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
-
 static inline void rcu_note_context_switch(int cpu)
 {
 	rcu_sched_qs(cpu);
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ