[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305202158520.3400@fry.nucleusys.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 22:08:32 +0300 (EEST)
From: Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drivers: net: usb: rtl8150: moving constant and
structure definitions out of rtl8150.c
On Mon, 20 May 2013, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Now how is this driver going to compile, when rtl8150.h is only added by
> the next patch?!
I got carried away by the desire to make each patch smaller and to the
point. Sacrificing build-ability of the tree, however, does not justify
it. My bad.
> You need to squash these first 2 together, so that the driver can be
> compiled after each step.
Will do once David merge 'net' into 'net-next'.
Petko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists