linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] tty: Add lock/unlock ldisc pair functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <519A9920.3010702@hurleysoftware.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 May 2013 17:44:00 -0400
From:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] tty: Add lock/unlock ldisc pair functions

On 05/20/2013 03:34 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 06:15:51AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> Just as the tty pair must be locked in a stable sequence
>> (ie, independent of which is consider the 'other' tty), so must
>> the ldisc pair be locked in a stable sequence as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
>
> This patch breaks the build :(

Sorry about that.

> I've taken the first one, care to mush this one with the 7/7 patch, so
> there are no build breaks, and resend the 5 resulting patches so I can
> apply these?

Maybe it would be better to reorder 7/7 to be 1/6, if that's ok?
More work for me but the history will be cleaner.

Regards,
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/