| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1369032694-13183-3-git-send-email-ks.giri@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 12:21:33 +0530
From: Girish K S <girishks2000@...il.com>
To: spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: grant.likely@...retlab.ca, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
Girish K S <girishks2000@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/3] spi: s3c64xx: Added provision for dedicated cs pin
From: Girish K S <girishks2000@...il.com>
The existing driver supports gpio based /cs signal.
For controller's that have one device per controller,
the slave device's /cs signal might be internally controlled
by the chip select bit of slave select register. They are not
externally asserted/deasserted using gpio pin.
This patch adds support for controllers with dedicated /cs pin.
if "cs-gpio" property doesnt exist in a spi dts node, the controller
would treat the /cs pin as dedicated.
Signed-off-by: Girish K S <ks.giri@...sung.com>
---
changes in v1:
Added the missing data structure that caused the
compilation error
drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
index 0a80692..eaf9e1c 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data {
struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config *port_conf;
unsigned int port_id;
unsigned long gpios[4];
+ bool cs_gpio;
};
static void flush_fifo(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd)
@@ -570,14 +571,16 @@ static inline void enable_cs(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
if (sdd->tgl_spi != spi) { /* if last mssg on diff device */
/* Deselect the last toggled device */
cs = sdd->tgl_spi->controller_data;
- gpio_set_value(cs->line,
- spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
+ if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+ gpio_set_value(cs->line,
+ spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
}
sdd->tgl_spi = NULL;
}
cs = spi->controller_data;
- gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 1 : 0);
+ if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+ gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 1 : 0);
/* Start the signals */
writel(0, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
@@ -709,7 +712,8 @@ static inline void disable_cs(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
if (sdd->tgl_spi == spi)
sdd->tgl_spi = NULL;
- gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
+ if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+ gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
/* Quiese the signals */
writel(S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SIG_INACT, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
@@ -997,8 +1001,10 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *s3c64xx_get_slave_ctrldata(
{
struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *cs;
struct device_node *slave_np, *data_np = NULL;
+ struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd;
u32 fb_delay = 0;
+ sdd = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
slave_np = spi->dev.of_node;
if (!slave_np) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "device node not found\n");
@@ -1018,7 +1024,10 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *s3c64xx_get_slave_ctrldata(
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
- cs->line = of_get_named_gpio(data_np, "cs-gpio", 0);
+ /* The CS line is asserted/deasserted by the gpio pin */
+ if (sdd->cs_gpio)
+ cs->line = of_get_named_gpio(data_np, "cs-gpio", 0);
+
if (!gpio_is_valid(cs->line)) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "chip select gpio is not specified or invalid\n");
kfree(cs);
@@ -1058,7 +1067,8 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
return -ENODEV;
}
- if (!spi_get_ctldata(spi)) {
+ /* Request gpio only if cs line is asserted by gpio pins */
+ if (sdd->cs_gpio) {
err = gpio_request_one(cs->line, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH,
dev_name(&spi->dev));
if (err) {
@@ -1067,9 +1077,11 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
cs->line, err);
goto err_gpio_req;
}
- spi_set_ctldata(spi, cs);
}
+ if (!spi_get_ctldata(spi))
+ spi_set_ctldata(spi, cs);
+
sci = sdd->cntrlr_info;
spin_lock_irqsave(&sdd->lock, flags);
@@ -1147,8 +1159,10 @@ err_gpio_req:
static void s3c64xx_spi_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *cs = spi_get_ctldata(spi);
+ struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd;
- if (cs) {
+ sdd = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
+ if (cs && sdd->cs_gpio) {
gpio_free(cs->line);
if (spi->dev.of_node)
kfree(cs);
@@ -1325,7 +1339,11 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
sdd->cntrlr_info = sci;
sdd->pdev = pdev;
sdd->sfr_start = mem_res->start;
+ sdd->cs_gpio = false;
if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
+ if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "cs-gpio", NULL))
+ sdd->cs_gpio = true;
+
ret = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "spi");
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get alias id, errno %d\n",
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists