[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130520011801.GC16811@verge.net.au>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:18:02 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: renesas-tpu: Add missing pwmchip_remove() call in
tpu_remove()
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 04:22:21PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Axel,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Sunday 19 May 2013 13:45:31 Axel Lin wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
> > index 8e6d8d7..351addd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-renesas-tpu.c
> > @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int tpu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return pwmchip_remove(&tpu->chip);
>
> Could you please move that line at the beginning of the function ? There would
> be a race condition otherwise, as the user could reenable PWM between the
> tpu_pwm_timer_stop() calls and the pwmchip_remove() call.
>
> Apart from that, the patch looks good.
Also, could you please CC linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
that will help me track the change through patchwork.
Thanks!
>
> > }
> >
> > static struct platform_driver tpu_driver = {
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists