[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305200941260.4719@fry.nucleusys.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 09:58:39 +0300 (EEST)
From: Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drivers: net: usb: rtl8150: bug fixing and cleanup
On Sun, 19 May 2013, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Which one ?
> - share it through the kernel or with userspace
> - personal choice .c split
It is obviously not the former. I think that in general constant and
other definitions (in their majority) should be in a header file. I
definitely like this way better.
Perhaps in this particular case my patch is a bit of an overkill as the
code lines aren't that many. If the consensus is in this direction i'll
revert this part of the series.
> I don't mind the later even if it does not exactly apply to a
> WIP driver. I'd still avoid future copycat followers though.
This isn't WIP anymore as the W(ork) part is missing. After so many quiet
years i assume the experimental tag should be removed.
> The rtl8150.h file is created in patch #2. This is patch #1.
>
> So...
So first apply patch #1 and then patch #2.
However, if it is required for the driver to be in build-able form after
applying any single patch i'll coalesce #1 and #2 before next submission.
David?
Petko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists