[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZOPZJTA9A8T4R8MtRCeqcYj3XJWFCXF+ojmEqza5TMj-6G+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 11:24:41 +0300
From: Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: eilong@...adcom.com, eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, donald.c.skidmore@...el.com,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, willemb@...gle.com,
andi@...stfloor.org, hpa@...or.com, eliezer@...ir.org.il
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 3/4] ixgbe: Add support for ndo_ll_poll
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:14 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 10:06:43 +0300
>
>> Hopefully this series will be accepted so we can send follow up support
>> for the bnx2x as well.
>
> I think in two or three more iterations it will be merged.
>
> There are no objections on the fundamentals, it's just implementation
> details and coding style at this point.
Dave, sorry, I might be a bit behind the rest of the reviewers, but I
just fail to understand nor find any reference that explains the
module param of ixgbe nor it makes sense to me to merge that piece of
the code upstream (its not for staging, correct?), as I wrote here
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136908123432072&w=2 basically, I
know you're not a great fun of module params (to say the least) and
surely not something named "allow_unsafe_removal", thoughts?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists