[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <519B418A.7060805@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 17:42:34 +0800
From: Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen@...wei.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
CC: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <libo.chen@...wei.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <samuel@...tiz.org>,
<stern@...land.harvard.edu>, <khc@...waw.pl>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <balbi@...com>,
<sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, <brudley@...adcom.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] driver:usb&net: add missing platform_driver owner
On 2013/5/21 17:06, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Gu Zheng,
>
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 16:00:19 +0800, Gu Zheng wrote:
>
>>> Or, maybe make the existing module_platform_driver() macro do this?
>>
>> But not all the modules use module_platform_driver() macro to replace the module init/exit.
>
> Then maybe it's a good opportunity to convert those ones to use
> module_platform_driver() ?
>
> Thomas
>
In my opinion, not all modules can use module_platform_driver() macro to replace the module init/exit easily, like us3mc_init.
Furthermore this work will touch various platforms and architectures, I am worried it is hard to *test* (compile and boot).
What do you think?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists