linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: add BUG_ON on illegal return values from scan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130521103439.GH11167@devil.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 21 May 2013 20:34:39 +1000
From:	Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
To:	Oskar Andero <oskar.andero@...ymobile.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Radovan Lekanovic <radovan.lekanovic@...ymobile.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: add BUG_ON on illegal return values from
 scan_objects

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:14:27AM +0200, Oskar Andero wrote:
> Add a BUG_ON to catch any illegal value from the shrinkers. This fixes a
> potential bug if scan_objects returns a negative other than -1, which
> would lead to undefined behaviour.
> 
> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Oskar Andero <oskar.andero@...ymobile.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 6bac41e..fbe6742 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ shrink_slab_one(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
>  		ret = shrinker->scan_objects(shrinker, shrinkctl);
>  		if (ret == -1)
>  			break;
> +		BUG_ON(ret < -1);
>  		freed += ret;
>  
>  		count_vm_events(SLABS_SCANNED, nr_to_scan);

NACK. we've got to fix the damn shrinkers first.

If you want this sort of guard added to the patchset Glauber and I
are working on that does this, then discuss it in the context of
that patch set.

Even if you do, you'll get the same answer: we need to first all the
busted shrinkers before we even consider being nasty about enforcing
the API constraints to prevent furture breakage.

If you want to do something useful, look at all the comments about
broken shrinkers in Glauber's patch set and work with the owners of
the code to understand what they really need and get them fixed.

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
dchinner@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/