[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130521151143.GH10453@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 16:11:43 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, "djbw @ fb . com" <djbw@...com>,
"linux-kernel @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel @ lists . infradead . org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmatest: abort transfers immediately when asked for
Hi Andy,
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:33:17PM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> When thread is going to be stopped we have to unconditionally terminate all
> ongoing transfers. Otherwise it would be possible that callback function will
> be called on the next interrupt and will try to access to already freed
> structures.
>
> The patch introduces specific error message for this, though it doesn't
> increase the counter of the failed tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Reported-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Thanks for persevering with this! Although this patch definitely fixes the
panic I was seeing, I now observe buffer verification failures in subsequent
test runs after an aborted run:
[ 43.888424] dma0chan0-copy0: #1: transfer aborted with src_off=0x81f0 dst_off=0x9f4 len=0xdf29 (0)
[ 43.888526] dma0chan0-copy0: terminating after 1 tests, 0 failures (status 0)
[ 43.888635] dmatest: thread dma0chan0-copy0 exited with status 0
<reload module and start new tests>
[ 77.341405] dma0chan0-copy0: #1: errors with src_off=0x8e29 dst_off=0x11dc8 len=0x2b93 (370)
[ 77.341505] dma0chan0-copy0: terminating after 1 tests, 1 failures (status 0)
Note that the non-aborted transfers (I have 4 dma controllers) seem fine.
Looking at the results file doesn't show anything obvious, although I do
see some strange entries:
[...]
dstbuf not copied! [0xffffffff] Expected ff, got ff
dstbuf not copied! [0xffffffff] Expected ff, got ff
dstbuf not copied! [0xffffffff] Expected 00, got 00
dstbuf not copied! [0xffffffff] Expected 00, got 00
dstbuf not copied! [0xffffffff] Expected ff, got ff
[...]
The more alarming ones look like:
[...]
dstbuf not copied! [0x147e9] Expected d5, got 36
dstbuf not copied! [0x147ea] Expected d4, got 35
dstbuf not copied! [0x147eb] Expected d3, got 34
dstbuf not copied! [0x147ec] Expected d2, got 33
dstbuf not copied! [0x147ed] Expected d1, got 32
dstbuf not copied! [0x147ee] Expected d0, got 31
[...]
Of course, this could be a driver bug with the PL330 that is being exposed
by this aborting code.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists