[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130521173140.GA3878@jtriplet-mobl1>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 10:31:41 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/13] rcu: Shrink TINY_RCU by reworking
CPU-stall ifdefs
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 07:58:20AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> TINY_RCU's reset_cpu_stall_ticks() and check_cpu_stalls() functions
> are defined unconditionally, and are empty functions if CONFIG_RCU_TRACE
> is disabled (which in turns disables detection of RCU CPU stalls).
> These empty functions can add a bit of bloat to TINY_RCU, so this
> commit reworks the ifdefs so that these functions are defined only
> if they actually do something.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Strange. Both of these functions are static, and called in only one
place, so shouldn't the compiler inline them (and thus throw them away
completely when empty)? Why does it not do so?
- Josh Triplett
> ---
> kernel/rcutiny.c | 4 ++--
> kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h | 6 ++----
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny.c b/kernel/rcutiny.c
> index 4adc9e2..aa34411 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutiny.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutiny.c
> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static int rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(void)
> */
> static int rcu_qsctr_help(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp)
> {
> - reset_cpu_stall_ticks(rcp);
> + RCU_TRACE(reset_cpu_stall_ticks(rcp));
> if (rcp->rcucblist != NULL &&
> rcp->donetail != rcp->curtail) {
> rcp->donetail = rcp->curtail;
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu)
> */
> void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user)
> {
> - check_cpu_stalls();
> + RCU_TRACE(check_cpu_stalls());
> if (user || rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle())
> rcu_sched_qs(cpu);
> else if (!in_softirq())
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> index 65ef180..0cd385a 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> @@ -158,15 +158,11 @@ static void check_cpu_stall(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp)
> rcp->jiffies_stall = jiffies + rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check();
> }
>
> -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE */
> -
> static void reset_cpu_stall_ticks(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE
> rcp->ticks_this_gp = 0;
> rcp->gp_start = jiffies;
> rcp->jiffies_stall = jiffies + rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check();
> -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE */
> }
>
> static void check_cpu_stalls(void)
> @@ -174,3 +170,5 @@ static void check_cpu_stalls(void)
> RCU_TRACE(check_cpu_stall(&rcu_bh_ctrlblk));
> RCU_TRACE(check_cpu_stall(&rcu_sched_ctrlblk));
> }
> +
> +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE */
> --
> 1.8.1.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists