[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1369158499.3301.236.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 10:48:19 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@....fi>
Cc: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/4] net: implement support for low latency
socket polling
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 19:02 +0200, Pekka Riikonen wrote:
> Maybe even that's not needed. Couldn't skb->queue_mapping give the
> correct NAPI instance in multiqueue nics? The NAPI instance could be made
> easily available from skb->dev. In any case an index is much better than
> a new pointer.
We do not keep skb->dev information once a packet leaves the rcu
protected region.
Once packet is queued to tcp input queues, skb->dev is NULL.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists