[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <519BCA37.4020707@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 22:25:43 +0300
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@....fi>,
Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/4] net: implement support for low latency
socket polling
On 21/05/2013 20:51, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 10:48 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> We do not keep skb->dev information once a packet leaves the rcu
>> protected region.
>>
>> Once packet is queued to tcp input queues, skb->dev is NULL.
>
> This is done in tcp_v4_rcv() & tcp_v6_rcv()
So if we move calling sk_mark_ll() into the rcu protected region,
We would not need the gen id in the skb.
We could save skb->dev and skb->queue_mapping along with the generation
id in the socket.
then we don't need to change the skb struct at all.
skb_mark_ll() can go away.
we also call sk_mark_ll in one central place in net_protocol->handler
instead of all over the place.
or am I missing something?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists