[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130521235410.GY29466@dastard>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 09:54:10 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS assertion from truncate. (3.10-rc2)
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 07:40:16PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:34:29AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:52:57PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > [ 464.210598] XFS: Assertion failed: (mask & (ATTR_MODE|ATTR_UID|ATTR_GID|ATTR_ATIME|ATTR_ATIME_SET| ATTR_MTIME_SET|ATTR_KILL_SUID|ATTR_KILL_SGID| ATTR_KILL_PRIV|ATTR_TIMES_SET)) == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c, line: 719
> >
> > Never seen that fire before, but this is why we have ASSERT()s like
> > this - we're being handed something by the VFS we don't expect...
> >
> > Can you give me some context of the file permissions before the
> > syscall and what the syscall parameters are? i.e. is this likely to
> > be trying to strip SUID/SGID during the truncate operation?
>
> no idea tbh. Is there something I can add to that assert to dump
> which file it was triggered by ?
Convert the assert to a if (), and then in the body do something
like:
if (mask & (...) {
char buf[MAX_PATHLEN];
d_path(VFS_I(ip)->i_dentry, buf, MAXPATHLEN);
xfs_warn(mp, "%s: mask 0x%x mismatch on file %s\n",
__func__, mask, buf);
ASSERT(0);
}
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists