[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <giy5b7uyfe.fsf@karga.hank.lab>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 12:00:21 +0200
From: Dirk Gouders <dirk@...ders.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: tools/lib/lk: redefinition of _FORTIFY_SOURCE (gcc-4.7.2)
Hello Borislav,
I am having problems with building liblk, but opposed to the recent
problem that Jiri noticed (commit b28b130719af6 Fix _FORTIFY_SOURCE
builds) I am getting errors because _FORTIFY_SOURCE is redefined:
<command-line>:0:0: error: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [-Werror]
debugfs.c:1:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
I guess this is because of different gcc versions being in use.
With gcc-4.7.2 _FORTIFY_SOURCE is defined as
$ gcc -E -dM - < /dev/null | grep -i fortify
#define _FORTIFY_SOURCE ((defined __OPTIMIZE__ && __OPTIMIZE__ > 0) ? 2 : 0)
gcc-4.6.4 uses
#define _FORTIFY_SOURCE 2
and would complain if we set _FORTIFY_SOURCE to something other than 2.
gcc-4.2.2 seems to use no definition of _FORTIFY_SOURCE, by default.
What probably might help in any case is undefining _FORTIFY_SOURCE before
defining it, because as far as I know, there is no problem with
undefining something that is not yet defined, but I could imagine,
others might have more elegant suggestions:
CFLAGS = -ggdb3 -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu99 -Werror -O6 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 $(EXTRA_WARNINGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) -fPIC
Dirk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists