lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b41fcb8e7f7deafe8f8f4c708daf81d4@gatzka.org>
Date:	Wed, 22 May 2013 15:06:27 +0200
From:	Stephan Gatzka <stephan.gatzka@...il.com>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
	linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: function call fw_iso_resource_mange(..) (core-iso.c) does not return

> Solution 2 --- Perform interdependent works in different queue 
> instances.
> (Keep the WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag set at those workqueues that have to take
> work which is necessary for progress of memory reclaim.  If this and 
> only
> this solution is employed for an SBP-2 initiator, we need two if not 
> more
> WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueue instances.)

I would go for this solution. I have no problems with lots of workqueues 
around, because there is only a relatively small structure required for 
each workqueue.

> 
> Solution 3 --- Remove the dependency between worklets:
> 
> 	Solution 3a --- Remove the lower-level worklet altogether.
> 	E.g. reimplement the lower-level worklet as a tasklet.

No, I like the workqueue context. :)


> 	Solution 3b --- Remove the higher-level worklet's dependency.
> 	E.g. reimplement the higher-level worklet such that it is woken by
> 	a timer and then aborts or reschedules ( = lets the lower-level
> 	worklet bubble up in the queue).

This looks more difficult to me and not so easy to test.

Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ