[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <519CDC70.7010308@sr71.net>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 07:55:44 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 26/39] ramfs: enable transparent huge page cache
On 05/22/2013 07:22 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Dave Hansen wrote:
>>> + /*
>>> + * TODO: make ramfs pages movable
>>> + */
>>> + mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping,
>>> + GFP_TRANSHUGE & ~__GFP_MOVABLE);
>>
>> So, before these patches, ramfs was movable. Now, even on architectures
>> or configurations that have no chance of using THP-pagecache, ramfs
>> pages are no longer movable. Right?
>
> No, it wasn't movable. GFP_HIGHUSER is not GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE (yeah,
> names of gfp constants could be more consistent).
>
> ramfs should be fixed to use movable pages, but it's outside the scope of the
> patchset.
>
> See more details: http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/2/720
Please make sure this is clear from the patch description.
Personally, I wouldn't be adding TODO's to the code that I'm not
planning to go fix, lest I would get tagged with _doing_ it. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists