linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] dma-mapping: Define dma_{alloc,free}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 May 2013 11:37:17 +0900
From:	Damian Hobson-Garcia <dhobsong@...l.co.jp>
To:	Damian Hobson-Garcia <dhobsong@...l.co.jp>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, msalter@...hat.com,
	linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org, deller@....de,
	linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] dma-mapping: Define dma_{alloc,free}_attrs() for
 all archs

Hello,
On 2013/04/30 12:01, Damian Hobson-Garcia wrote:
> Most architectures that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA=y, have implementations for
> both dma_alloc_attrs() and dma_free_attrs().  All achitectures that do
> not define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA also have both of these definitions provided by
> dma-mapping-broken.h.
> 
> Provide a default definition for the archs that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA=y,
> but have no implementation for dma_{alloc,free}_attrs(). 
> 
> As I don't have hardware for any of these systems, the patches are only
> compile-tested where I could (arm64, s390) and untested for the archs
> where I couldn't find a readily available prebuilt cross-compiler (c6x, parisc).
> 


>  arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h  |   17 +++++++++++------
>  arch/c6x/include/asm/dma-mapping.h    |    3 +++
>  arch/parisc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h |    3 +++
>  arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h   |   17 +++++++++++------
>  4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 

Since this series spans several architectures, what would be the best
way to have this patch series merged?
Should I resubmit each patch to the mailing list for each architecture
separately?

Thank you,
Damian

-- 
Damian Hobson-Garcia
IGEL Co.,Ltd
http://www.igel.co.jp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/