lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 22 May 2013 19:11:09 +0200
From:	Florian Meier <florian.meier@...lo.de>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Add support for BCM2708

On 22.05.2013 18:15, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 05/22/2013 10:08 AM, Florian Meier wrote:
>> On 22.05.2013 17:22, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 05/22/2013 08:10 AM, Florian Meier wrote:
>>>> This driver adds support for digital audio (I2S)
>>>> for the BCM2708 SoC that is used by the
>>>> Raspberry Pi. External audio codecs can be
>>>> connected to the Raspberry Pi via P5 header.
>>>>
>>>> It relies on cyclic DMA engine support for BCM2708
>>>> that is not included in this patch.
>>>
>>> This SoC is actually the BCM2835, so the files should be named for that.
>>
>> Actually, I changed the name several times and in the end I sticked to
>> https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/22
>> but if you think it is better to use BCM2835 I am happy to agree with
>> you and change it.
>>
>>> Upstream only uses device tree for BCM2835. Does this driver support DT?
>>> Where is the DT binding definition file?
>>
>> I have not accomplished to use the mainline kernel and DT with the
>> Raspberry Pi. Do you have any introductive information about how to do this?
> 
> Oh, so is this patch intended for the downstream Raspberry Pi Foundation
> kernel, or the upstream kernel?
> 
> The fact you haven't run it on the upstream kernel implies that you
> intend the patch to be applied to the downstream kernel.
> 
> The fact you sent the driver to all the upstream mailing lists implies
> that you intend the patch to be applied to the upstream kernel.
>
> BTW, I wrote a Google+ post on using the upstream kernel on the Pi:
> https://plus.google.com/101715070573995136397/posts/gWkwrfNfYVm

I chatted with Mark Brown about this issue and if I understood him
correctly he suggested to send it upstream anyway.

Either way, your blog post gives me great hope to get this running
tomorrow so this won't be an issue anymore.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ