[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <519D2C63.7020002@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 22:36:51 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PING^7 (was Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Corrections and customization
of the SG_IO command whitelist (CVE-2012-4542))
Il 22/05/2013 22:19, Theodore Ts'o ha scritto:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:37:54PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> If it's not theoretical, how does the cloud service control who has
>>> access to the CD burner, and how are the disks loaded into the CD
>>> burner?
>>
>> CD burning would be used in a VM that runs on your local workstation, so
>> the VM gets access to the CD burner under your desk. There was also a
>> developer of a CD burning tool that wanted to test it inside BSD,
>> Solaris and Windows VMs; the idea is the same.
>
> So in both cases all of the VM's and the host OS are within the same
> trust boundary. This simplifies the security requirements than in the
> more generic cloud server caser where the VM's are mutually
> suspicious. This simplifies the requirements of what we need to push
> into the kernel, yes?
What do you mean by "push into the kernel"?
(Anyway the CD burner case is really the only one that the current
whitelist covers completely. I was just listing it as a use case for
SG_IO in the context as virtualization).
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists