[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130522210447.GA26123@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 23:04:47 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: Get rid of cpuinit?
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 03:35:43PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> We have gotten rid of devinit markup. A recent patch of Linus' makes me
> wonder if we similarly should get rid of cpuinit markup?
>
> Just as with devices, the CPU hotplug machinery has been leveraged to
> support a number of pieces of functionality such as suspend, which means
> that on anything but the most embedded systems this functionality is
> likely needed anyway.
If you grep for CPU_HOTPLUG in various defconfig files you will see that
it is only set in a few of these files (at least in arm/configs/).
I did not check it CPU_HOTPLUG would be set when
you actually used the config - but at least we need to pay attention
to the current usage.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists