linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/14] bcon: remove version 1.0 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130522195108.GB7399@logfs.org>
Date:	Wed, 22 May 2013 15:51:09 -0400
From:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] bcon: remove version 1.0 support

On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:48:37 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu,  9 May 2013 16:43:07 -0400 Joern Engel <joern@...fs.org> wrote:
> 
> > Very few machines ever ran with 1.0 format and by now I doubt whether a
> > single one still does.  No need to carry that code along.
> 
> aw geeze.  Can we please clean up the patch series?

People started using my git tree, so I decided to keep it stable and
not fold fixes into the main patch.  That admittedly sucks for review.

Would you like me to create a single patch for review?  And after
that, do you want to carry a single patch in your series or should I
keep my tree and try to get that merged?  Either way works for me.

Jörn

--
Ninety percent of everything is crap.
-- Sturgeon's Law
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/