[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <519C4D6E.6080902@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 12:45:34 +0800
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2, RFC] Driver core: Introduce offline/online callbacks
for memory blocks
Hi Rafael,
On 05/21/2013 07:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
......
>>> + mem->state = to_state;
>>> + if (to_state == MEM_ONLINE)
>>> + mem->last_online = online_type;
>>
>> Why do we need to remember last online type ?
>>
>> And as far as I know, we can obtain which zone a page was in last time it
>> was onlined by check page->flags, just like online_pages() does. If we
>> use online_kernel or online_movable, the zone boundary will be
>> recalculated.
>> So we don't need to remember the last online type.
>>
>> Seeing from your patch, I guess memory_subsys_online() can only handle
>> online and offline. So mem->last_online is used to remember what user has
>> done through the original way to trigger memory hot-remove, right ? And
>> when
>> user does it in this new way, it just does the same thing as user does last
>> time.
>>
>> But I still think we don't need to remember it because if finally you call
>> online_pages(), it just does the same thing as last time by default.
>>
>> online_pages()
>> {
>> ......
>> if (online_type == ONLINE_KERNEL ......
>>
>> if (online_type == ONLINE_MOVABLE......
>>
>> zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn));
>>
>> /* Here, the page will be put into the zone which it belong to last
>> time. */
>
> To be honest, it wasn't entirely clear to me that online_pages() would do the
> same thing as last time by default. Suppose, for example, that the previous
> online_type was ONLINE_MOVABLE. How online_pages() is supposed to know that
> it should do the move_pfn_zone_right() if we don't tell it to do that? Or
> is that unnecessary, because it's already been done previously?
Yes, it is unnecessary. move_pfn_zone_right/left() will modify the zone
related
bits in page->flags. But when the page is offline, the zone related bits in
page->flags will not change. So when it is online again, by dafault, it
will
be in the zone which it was in last time.
......
>>
>> I just thought of it. Maybe I missed something in your design. Please tell
>> me if I'm wrong.
>
> Well, so what should be passed to __memory_block_change_state() in
> memory_subsys_online()? -1?
If you want to keep the last time status, you can pass ONLINE_KEEP.
Or -1 is all right.
Thanks. :)
>
>> Reviewed-by: Tang Chen<tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
>>
>> Thanks. :)
>
> Thanks for your comments,
> Rafael
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists