[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <519DD110.3070002@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 16:19:28 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Changlong Xie <xiechanglong87@...il.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bp@...en8.de,
pjt@...gle.com, namhyung@...nel.org, efault@....de,
morten.rasmussen@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
mgorman@...e.de, riel@...hat.com, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Changlong Xie <changlongx.xie@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v6 8/8] sched: remove blocked_load_avg in tg
On 05/23/2013 03:32 PM, Changlong Xie wrote:
> 2013/5/16 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>:
>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 07:35:25PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>>> I tested all benchmarks on cover letter maintained, aim7, kbuild etc.
>>> with autogroup enabled. There is no clear performance change.
>>> But since the machine just run benchmark without anyother load, that
>>> doesn't enough.
>>
>> Back when we started with smp-fair cgroup muck someone wrote a test for it. I
>> _think_ it ended up in the LTP test-suite.
>>
>
> Hi Peter
>
> my test results:
> 3.10-rc1 patch1-7 patch1-8
> duration=764 duration=754 duration=750
> duration=764 duration=754 duration=751
> duration=763 duration=755 duration=751
>
> duration means the seconds of testing cost.
>
> Tested-by: Changlong Xie <changlongx.xie@...el.com>
Seems the 8th patch is helpful on cgroup. Thanks Changlong!
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists