[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130523001957.GA32651@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 20:19:58 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
fenghua.yu@...el.com
Subject: Re: microcode loading got really slow.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:09:52PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:03:04PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > On 05/21/2013 04:03 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > In 3.10-rc2 I see this happening..
> > > >
> > > > [ 72.318133] microcode: CPU1 sig=0x306c3, pf=0x2, revision=0x6
> > > > [ 132.446449] microcode: CPU2 sig=0x306c3, pf=0x2, revision=0x6
> > > > [ 192.573101] microcode: CPU3 sig=0x306c3, pf=0x2, revision=0x6
> >> > [ 252.702055] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00
> ><tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba
> > > >
> >> > For some reason the events for udev seem to be getting delayed 60s
> >for each core.
> > > >
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > >
> > > Is this a regression from -rc1?
> >
> >No. Looks like it was introduced between 3.9 and 3.10-rc1
> >
> >I see bisecting in my future.
> >
> A bisect would be appreciated. Cc Fenghua.
Turns out that I can reproduce this on 3.9 too (and likely earlier) with the right
config file. I'm not sure what option causes the delay yet. Isolating differences
between configs now.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists