[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <519DF84B.10401@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 14:06:51 +0300
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alex Rosenbaum <alexr@...lanox.com>
CC: Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/4] net: low latency Ethernet device polling
On 21/05/2013 16:15, Alex Rosenbaum wrote:
> On 5/21/2013 3:29 PM, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
>> What benchmarks are you using to test poll/select/epoll?
> for epoll/select latency tests we are using sockperf as performance
> latency tool: https://code.google.com/p/sockperf/
> It is a client-server based tool and it supported ping-pong, throughput,
> and under-load test type.
> For epoll, you will need to define a 'feedfile' ("-f filepathname")
> which has a list of TCP and/or UDP socket and defined your IO mux type
> ("-F epoll").
Thank you!
This is very helpful.
With sockperf i can directly observe how poll/select/epoll are behaving.
I can see some improvement in all of them but clearly more work is
needed here.
-Eliezer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists