[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1369315769.6828.198.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 09:29:29 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Stanislav Meduna <stano@...una.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Hai Huang <hhuang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix up a spurious page fault whenever it happens
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 08:19 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> We can add a bit in the architecture bits that
> we use to check against other CPU and system
> errata, and conditionally flush the whole TLB
> from __native_flush_tlb_single().
If we find that some CPUs have issues and others do not, and we can
determine this by checking the CPU type at run time, I would strongly
suggest using the jump_label infrastructure to do the branches. I know
this is early to suggest something like this, but I just wanted to put
it in your head ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists