linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: move at91 aic driver to drivers/irqchip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 May 2013 13:59:14 +0200
From:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>,
	Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: move at91 aic driver to drivers/irqchip

On 11:18 Thu 23 May     , Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:05:07AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> > Move arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c to drivers/irqchip/irq-at91.c.
> > Move arch/arm/mach-at91/at91_aic.h to
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_aic.h to avoid ugly reference
> > to header file :
> > #include "../../arch/arm/mach-at91/at91_aic.h"
> 
> The right way to do this is to move the definitions which should only
> be used by arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c to that file or a header file along
> side that file, and find a place in include/linux for the remainder.
> 
> I notice arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c makes use of some of the register
> definitions:
> 
>         at91_irq_suspend();
> 
>         pr_debug("AT91: PM - wake mask %08x, pm state %d\n",
>                         /* remember all the always-wake irqs */
>                         (at91_pmc_read(AT91_PMC_PCSR)
>                                         | (1 << AT91_ID_FIQ)
>                                         | (1 << AT91_ID_SYS)
>                                         | (at91_extern_irq))
>                                 & at91_aic_read(AT91_AIC_IMR),
>                         state);
> 
> at91_irq_suspend() is in arch/arm/mach-at91/irq.c already, so there's no
> reason that fragment can't be moved there.
> 
> That leaves: at91_aic_handle_irq, at91_aic5_handle_irq, NR_AIC_IRQS and
> NR_AIC5_IRQS, which if you did patch 3 first, would leave you with just
> the NR_.*_IRQS definitions to find a home for.

Boris please update as this

Best Regards,
J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/