lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130523155532.GE16419@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 May 2013 11:55:32 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	fenghua.yu@...el.com
Subject: Re: microcode loading got really slow.

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:27:08PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
 > > Yes, in your case, everything is fine in the kernel itself.  And no
 > > microcode update is needed for new CPU, thus no firmware.
 > 
 > Can the driver decide if the CPU need microcode? Or there will
 > be the microcode for the CPU in future?

The kernel can't know. The microcode updates are asynchonously released
from the kernel. I might be running a months old kernel, and get a new
microcode tomorrow.  The kernel handles this by looking for a file
with a name matching the cpu family/model/stepping. (See how they are
formed in /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/*)

	DAve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ