linux-kernel - Re: OOPS in perf_mmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1305231936210.2452@vincent-weaver-1.um.maine.edu>
Date:	Thu, 23 May 2013 19:40:12 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc:	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	trinity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OOPS in perf_mmap_close()

On Thu, 23 May 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:10:36AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > 
> > I can confirm your patch avoids the oops on my machine.
> > 
> > It does lead to interesting behavior if I run the sample program
> > multiple times (with added printfs):
> > 
> > vince@...e2:~$ ./perf_mmap_close_bug 
> > mmap1=0x7f06a6e90000
> > mmap2=0x7f06a6e7f000
> > vince@...e2:~$ ./perf_mmap_close_bug 
> > mmap1=0x7f878a138000
> > mmap2=0x7f878a127000
> > vince@...e2:~$ ./perf_mmap_close_bug 
> > mmap1=0xffffffffffffffff
> > Error opening fd2 Invalid argument
> > 
> > and then it never successfully completes again.  Is this unexpected 
> > behavior?  
> 
> Sounds weird to me, I'll see if I can reproduce/understand.

I tracked this down in case you haven't already.

The problem is that in the kernel patched 
with your patch locked_vm is getting decremented twice in the sample code 
and going negative.  I'm not sure why this isn't a problem until the 
third time through.  Here are my crude debug printk 
results from kernel/events/core.c

[   28.684862] user_extra: 17 user_lock_limit: 129
[   28.698458] user_locked: 17 locked_vm: 0 user_extra 17
[   28.713853] locked: 0 locked_vm: 0 pinned_vm: 0 extra: 0 lock_limit: 16
[   28.733728] perf_mmap: locked_vm: 17
[   28.744509] mmap_close: locked_vm=0
[   28.754939] mmap_close: locked_vm=-17
[   29.472741] user_extra: 17 user_lock_limit: 129
[   29.486332] user_locked: 0 locked_vm: -17 user_extra 17
[   29.501996] locked: 0 locked_vm: 0 pinned_vm: 0 extra: 0 lock_limit: 16
[   29.521874] perf_mmap: locked_vm: 0
[   29.532400] mmap_close: locked_vm=-17
[   29.543352] mmap_close: locked_vm=-34
[   30.028236] user_extra: 17 user_lock_limit: 129
[   30.041835] user_locked: -17 locked_vm: -34 user_extra 17
[   30.058018] extra: -275 user_locked: -17 user_lock_limit: 258
[   30.075232] locked: -275 locked_vm: 0 pinned_vm: 0 extra: -275 lock_limit: 16

Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/