[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130524170626.2ac06efe@holzheu>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 17:06:26 +0200
From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>,
Jan Willeke <willeke@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore for s390
Hello Vivek,
On Fri, 24 May 2013 10:36:44 -0400
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
[snip]
> Sorry, I don't understand the problem. If we swapped low memory and
> crash reserved memory, that should have been taken care by prepared
> ELF headers so that we map the right pfns. In x86 we swap 640K of low
> memory with 640K of memory in reserved and we take care of this by
> preparing elf headers accordingly.
>
> So why s390 can't do the same thing?
I am not sure if I understand this. Currently we create the ELF
header in a way that we have virtual=real. In the copy_oldmem_page() we
do the swap so that for the /proc/vmcore code it looks like contiguous
non-swapped memory.
One reason why I thought this was necessary was that /dev/oldmem
also uses the function and it should provide linear memory access like
it is on the live system with /dev/mem.
Is that implementation incorrect?
Best Regards,
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists