linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] module: use a macro instead of platform_driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130525122240.GC3746@kroah.com>
Date:	Sat, 25 May 2013 05:22:40 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Libo Chen <clbchenlibo.chen@...wei.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	stern@...land.harvard.edu, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: use a macro instead of platform_driver_register

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 12:40:50PM +0800, Libo Chen wrote:
> 
> I found a lot of mistakes using struct platform_driver without owner
> so I make a macro instead of the function platform_driver_register.
> It can set owner in it, then guys don`t care about module owner again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen <libo.chen@...wei.com>

Nice job, that's the better way to fix this, I'll queue it up for 3.11.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/