[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A152DF.8030807@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 18:10:07 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...stprotocols.net,
mingo@...nel.org, fweisbec@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] perf kvm: split out tracepoints from record args
On 5/10/13 6:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> + for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_events_tp); j++) {
>> + rec_argv[i++] = "-e";
>> + rec_argv[i++] = STRDUP_FAIL_EXIT(kvm_events_tp[j]);
>> + }
>> +
>
> just curious.. I dont understand why it needs to be dynamic?
>
> jirka
>
passing a new set of args to cmd_record -- what the user passed in
augmented with the tracepoints needed for kvm stat.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists